Menu
About the DBA
  
  About the Bar
  Advertising
  Bar News
  Board of Directors
  Committees
  Dallas Bar Foundation
  DBA Presidents
  Event Videos
  Guidelines of Professional Courtesy
  In Memoriam
  Judicial Election Creeds
  Lawyer's Creed
  Mansion Expansion
  Oral History Project
  Photo Book
  Press
  Sections
  Staff of the DBA
  Texas High School Mock Trial Competition

Membership Info
  
  Member Benefits
  Application
  Committees
  Learn More About DVAP
  FAQs
  Lawyer Referral
  Sections

Calendar / CLE
  
  Calendar
  CLE Articles
  Event & MCLE Information
  North Clinic Location

Members Only
  
  2010 Dues Receipt
  Change of Address
  Committees
  DBA Member Directory
  Legal Forms
  Legal Resource & Expert Witness Guide
  Sections

Attorney Resources
  
  Bench Book
  Classifieds
  Court Records
  Courts - Jury Questionnaire
  Headnotes
  LRS Newsletters
  Law Libraries
  Lawyer Referral
  Links
  Mediators Standards of Practice
  Mentor Program
  MyTexasBar.com
  Pro Bono Opportunities
  Secretarial Placement
  Spanish for Lawyers
  State Bar of Texas
  Texas Lawyers' Assistance Program
  Transition to Law Practice Program

Public Resources
  
  Belo Mansion
  Consumer Tips
  Community Legal Resources
  Judicial Election Information
  Lawyer Referral Service
  LegalLine
  Legal Ethics Opinions
  Legal Resource & Expert Witness Guide
  Links
  Meeting/Catering at Belo
  Need an Attorney? Click Here...
  Secretarial Placement
  Task Force Report

Judiciary Info
  
  Bench Book
  Guardian Ad Litem
  General Election Polls
  General Info About Polls
  Judicial Election Creeds
  Judicial Links
  Judicial Poll Study Group Report Adopted by DBA Board Nov 2007
  Judicial Profiles
  Primary Election Polls
  Resolution on Judicial Campaigning

Fee Dispute Rules
  
  Fee Arbitration Response - PDF Doc
  Petition for Fee Arbitration - PDF Doc
  Rules for Fee Arbitration

Grievance Procedures
Sections
  
  Alternate Dispute Resolution
  Antitrust & Trade Regulation
  Appellate Law
  Bankruptcy & Commercial Law
  Business Litigation
  Collaborative Law
  Computer Law
  Construction Law
  Corporate Counsel
  Criminal Law
  Employee Benefits/Executive Compensation
  Energy Law
  Environmental Law
  Family Law
  Franchise Law & Distribution
  Government Law
  Health Law
  Intellectual Property Law
  International Law
  Labor & Employment Law
  Mergers and Acquisitions
  Probate, Trusts & Estates
  Real Property Law
  Securities
  Solo & Small Firm
  Sports & Entertainment Law
  Tax
  Tort & Insurance Practices
  Trial Skills




Presidents' Pages
2010
     Ike Vanden Eykel
2009
     Christina Melton Crain
2008
     Frank E. Stevenson II
2007
     Beverly B. Godbey
2006
     Mark K. Sales
2005
     Timothy W. Mountz
2004
     Rhonda Hunter




Dallas Bar Association
2101 Ross Avenue
Dallas, Texas 75201
View Map
214-220-7400
214-220-7465 (fax)


 

Muniment of Title: The Misunderstood Method of Probate

by Don D. Ford III
March 2006

Most lawyers understand, at least to some degree, the concepts related to filing a will for probate and having the court appoint an executor or administrator. However, few lawyers understand the process and effects of probating a will as a “muniment of title.” When a will is filed for probate as a muniment of title, the applicant is asking the court to recognize the will as valid, admit the will to probate, and not appoint an executor or administrator. This obviously differs drastically from a traditional method of probate where the executor or administrator is appointed by the court to identify the assets, pay the debts, and distribute the remaining assets. In a muniment of title case, once the court signs an order admitting the will to probate, the county clerk records both the will and the order admitting the will to probate in the deed records of the county. The recording of these documents effectively links the chain of title between the decedent and those listed under the will as beneficiaries of the estate. This “transfer” of title in property is accomplished without the appointment of a personal representative to effectuate the transfer, but rather is simply accomplished as a result of the court’s order admitting the will to probate. While the muniment of title method sounds rather easy and less costly than a traditional probate, a couple of factors must be considered. First, in order to file a will as a muniment of title, the decedent must not have owed any debts at the time of his death, or his debts must have been satisfied prior to the filing of the will. In a vast number of cases, this requirement forecloses the option of using the muniment of title method. Second, a practical problem arises from the probate of a will as a muniment of title. The entire concept of a muniment of title is a concept arising under Texas law and is not recognized, at least in name, by other states. As a result, lawyers in other states do not understand the concept or the effect. This can become a problem with banks, brokerage firms, transfer agents, and the like who are located out of state and are represented by legal departments consisting of non-Texas lawyers. In some instances, these firms will outright refuse to accept a muniment of title as an effective method of transferring accounts, shares of stock, etc., and will require the appointment of an executor or administrator. The unwary lawyer who discovers this only after having finished the muniment of title process finds himself spending inordinate amounts of time and resources to address this issue. The most effective use of a muniment of title is in estates where the sole or primary assets consist of real estate located in Texas. In those instances, title companies recognize the effect of the muniment of title, and they will simply require that the will and order admitting the will be recorded in each county in which the decedent owned real estate. In those cases, the transfer of the decedent’s property and the resulting sale to outside parties is accomplished very easily and cost efficiently for the client. Like a traditional method of probate, a four-year statute of limitations from the date of the decedent’s death applies to the filing of a will for probate as a muniment of title. However, a very important exception exists. If an applicant is not found to have been in default for failing to probate a will in less than four years, then the court can admit the will to probate as a muniment of title. This is the only method of having a will admitted to probate more than four years after the decedent’s death, which leaves the muniment of title as the only method for probate in some instances. The various courts around the state differ on the level of proof required to find that the applicant was not in default for not having brought the will within the limitations period. However, all of the courts are consistent in that the applicant for probate outside of four years must serve notice on all of the heirs at law prior to the will be admitted to probate as a muniment of title. In certain cases, the muniment of title is the most cost-effective and quickest method of probating a will. In other cases, it is nothing but a trap creating problems for the unwary lawyer. Before filing a will for probate, make sure that you understand the difference.HN



Don D. Ford III is a partner at Ford & Mathiason LLP, a firm with offices in Dallas and Houston.




 

Copyright © 2000-2010 Dallas Bar Association